There's a good passage in A Death in the Family which explains that when you are grown up (i.e no longer a child , no longer striving with wonder, activity and boredom), you have the measure of things - the framework in which your life exists, and "that is when time begins to pick up speed" and begins racing through our lives - "before we know what is happening we are forty, fifty, sixty ..." The consequence is, as he says when he sees his father both from the perspective of the child he was and the adult now older than his father at that time:
"...on the one hand I see him as I saw him at that time, through the eyes of an eight-year-old: unpredictable and frightening; on the other hand, I see him as a peer through whose life time is blowing and unremittingly sweeping large chunks of meaning along with it.
Knausgaard, Karl Ove (2012-03-01). A Death in the Family: My Struggle Book 1 (My Struggle 1) (p. 10). Random House. Kindle Edition.
The image of time blowing these rock like chunks of meaning is a strange one, located in the fact that the father he is/was observing is wielding a sledgehammer to break rocks and widen their vegetable garden. Shades of Ozymandias, or that riddle in the Hobbit. How can something so insubstantial and ethereal break so much apart.
Wednesday, 17 April 2013
Tuesday, 16 April 2013
Every so often.. Freedom from Fear - The American people in Depression and War 1929-1945 Day 3, A Death in the Family: My Struggle Book 1 (My Struggle 1 Day 1
Every so often the faintly discernible thread that links the reading of one book with the reading of the next is cut by something external - it might just be a change of venue, or even an abrupt change of mood where what you wanted to read yesterday suddenly becomes distant and boring, or it might even be (worst case scenario) a slow growing disillusionment with a book, a creeping sense that this really isn't worth the effort of plodding through, a narrative that gradually condemns itself with weary banal slow (very slow) steps, as you spend more time wondering whether it's worth finishing, especially if you have put hours and hours of reading effort in. It's like climbing a promising hill, nice path, interesting prospects on promise only to peek over the top at yet another steeper hill lost in mist and drizzle, with no relief or end in sight.
For me two days ago it was just being in a different place, a long drive up to Retford for the funeral of my best friend, and picking up a huge unwieldy book called Freedom from Fear - The American people in Depression and War 1929-1945, starting it, and being completely transported into the desire to know what happened in this huge country, to make it what it is today, along with a not quite random secondary desire to maybe pick up Boardwalk Empire again - I think we left off watching about episode 4 or 5. It means I abandoned The Point, although I will go back and read those stories, perhaps in parallel.
Then back home, sitting at the table in the kitchen reading the Guardian review, I found a book review of the second book in a series by Karl Ove Knausgaard: A Death in the Family: My Struggle Book 1 (My Struggle 1), a review that made me turn to my Nexus 7, charging quietly on the computer desk behind me, and, since it was reasonably priced, buy it immediately, and then begin to read it, and realise certainly from the first two pages, that this was a good decision.
So there I am with two new starting points, the Dostoevsky looking less attractive now, though I think I might gallop through Notes from the Underground again, but now as then I find his vituperative, twisted character strangely uninteresting, a mouthpiece for views and prejudices that don't really sit very easily in my life. It feels like a very nihilistic text. And then alongside, a difficult parallel read again ( I'm keen on parallel reads, sometimes linked, sometimes not, one book enriches another if only by giving you a change of style and track) of Rowan Williams book about how Dostoevsky (probably) can show and teach us a lot about faith and belief, once you separate put the rabid nationalism and obviously ridiculous poses. I'm beginning to prefer Chekov to Dostoevsky, and, possibly, Tolstoy.
For me two days ago it was just being in a different place, a long drive up to Retford for the funeral of my best friend, and picking up a huge unwieldy book called Freedom from Fear - The American people in Depression and War 1929-1945, starting it, and being completely transported into the desire to know what happened in this huge country, to make it what it is today, along with a not quite random secondary desire to maybe pick up Boardwalk Empire again - I think we left off watching about episode 4 or 5. It means I abandoned The Point, although I will go back and read those stories, perhaps in parallel.
Then back home, sitting at the table in the kitchen reading the Guardian review, I found a book review of the second book in a series by Karl Ove Knausgaard: A Death in the Family: My Struggle Book 1 (My Struggle 1), a review that made me turn to my Nexus 7, charging quietly on the computer desk behind me, and, since it was reasonably priced, buy it immediately, and then begin to read it, and realise certainly from the first two pages, that this was a good decision.
So there I am with two new starting points, the Dostoevsky looking less attractive now, though I think I might gallop through Notes from the Underground again, but now as then I find his vituperative, twisted character strangely uninteresting, a mouthpiece for views and prejudices that don't really sit very easily in my life. It feels like a very nihilistic text. And then alongside, a difficult parallel read again ( I'm keen on parallel reads, sometimes linked, sometimes not, one book enriches another if only by giving you a change of style and track) of Rowan Williams book about how Dostoevsky (probably) can show and teach us a lot about faith and belief, once you separate put the rabid nationalism and obviously ridiculous poses. I'm beginning to prefer Chekov to Dostoevsky, and, possibly, Tolstoy.
Wednesday, 10 April 2013
Charle's D'Ambrosio, The Point & other stories
Ever since I been listening to the New Yorker short fiction podcasts I've been meaning to buy some of the authors I had never heard of before. Started with The Point, the tile story of which is read here: The Point. I'm already having a break from the Dostoevsky, but yesterday was a busy day, and the second story in this collection was the one I read: "Her Real Name". Just like when I listened to the podcast of "The Point" I was a little uncertain about the voice, but then got swept into this hot, dusty elegy, with its contrasting ending out on the water, black and cool at night.
It felt quite long, maybe because I wanted to finish it before I went to sleep, but I didn't want to rush the reading. It's about 40 pages long, so say 12,000 words - a substantial length for a short story, there's plenty you can pack in. And there you are, another strange story absorbed, another set of images, quite strong at the moment, but how long will they last? The Point itself is fairly unforgettable - I think I may have listened to it twice (or else it made such an impression on me that I just think I've listened to it twice). When I first listened I had to break off h ten or fifteen minutes in and I wasn't that happy with the story, wasn't sure if I would go back to it. But I did - I started again, and got involved in that narrator's voice - a thirteen year old boy, somewhat unbelievable, but somehow believable.
It felt quite long, maybe because I wanted to finish it before I went to sleep, but I didn't want to rush the reading. It's about 40 pages long, so say 12,000 words - a substantial length for a short story, there's plenty you can pack in. And there you are, another strange story absorbed, another set of images, quite strong at the moment, but how long will they last? The Point itself is fairly unforgettable - I think I may have listened to it twice (or else it made such an impression on me that I just think I've listened to it twice). When I first listened I had to break off h ten or fifteen minutes in and I wasn't that happy with the story, wasn't sure if I would go back to it. But I did - I started again, and got involved in that narrator's voice - a thirteen year old boy, somewhat unbelievable, but somehow believable.
Monday, 8 April 2013
Dostoevsky - Language, Faith and Fiction
From sexy cult to the ex- Archbishop of Canterbury's book on Dostoevsky is a big step, but Dostoevsky has had a huge impact on me and my reading from teenage years onwards. I'll probably start rereading Notes from Underground just to get all Dostoevskyied up. And spelling that name - it's so easy if you break it down
Dos (2 more syllables)
toev ( a russian toe)
sky (as in reach for)
There are plenty of alternative spellings - Penguin go for "Dostoyevsky", but that adds an extra complexity, so I'm sticking with the simplest, and if it's good enough for the Archbishop of Canterbury than it's good enough for me.
Being able to spell Dostoevsky is always impressive, should there be anyone to display this talent to. I speak as someone who once wrote a "beautifully suggested" essay on Dostoevsky, and existentialism, but misspelt Sartre as Satre all the way through (way back in the 1970s, Modern European Mind at Sussex University).
So Rowan Williams take is a specifically Christian one, natch, ( I don't think he's read or will read Pedro Juan Gutierrez) and is coming from a deep (as in knows a lot about) theological perspective, most of which is lost on me. But his reading of Dostoevsky is still accessible and meaningful, as long as you take it slowly. I'm going to use the blog to try and keep track of what he is saying, in the hope of finding what? Enlightenment? Probably not, just a clearer light shone of the complexities of Dostoevsky.
So lets have a sample of Rowan William's prose. This is genuinely the next sentence I read as I picked up where I had left off this morning.
"What we have here, in fact, is remarkably like a highly dramatized version of the Hegalian Unhappy Consciousness, with a few extra refinements: the self's ideal existence is unattainable, and what is actually experienced in self-awareness is failure and finitude finitude itself as a form of humiliation"
p19
(my link added for the Hegalian Unhappy Consciousness, should you be unfamiliar...)
I'll come back later and add some more as there are other things to do - and this snippet is, in context (rather unfair just to lift it like this) insightful. I think. I do need to think, and the challenge of having to do that will keep me going.
Dos (2 more syllables)
toev ( a russian toe)
sky (as in reach for)
There are plenty of alternative spellings - Penguin go for "Dostoyevsky", but that adds an extra complexity, so I'm sticking with the simplest, and if it's good enough for the Archbishop of Canterbury than it's good enough for me.
Being able to spell Dostoevsky is always impressive, should there be anyone to display this talent to. I speak as someone who once wrote a "beautifully suggested" essay on Dostoevsky, and existentialism, but misspelt Sartre as Satre all the way through (way back in the 1970s, Modern European Mind at Sussex University).
So Rowan Williams take is a specifically Christian one, natch, ( I don't think he's read or will read Pedro Juan Gutierrez) and is coming from a deep (as in knows a lot about) theological perspective, most of which is lost on me. But his reading of Dostoevsky is still accessible and meaningful, as long as you take it slowly. I'm going to use the blog to try and keep track of what he is saying, in the hope of finding what? Enlightenment? Probably not, just a clearer light shone of the complexities of Dostoevsky.
So lets have a sample of Rowan William's prose. This is genuinely the next sentence I read as I picked up where I had left off this morning.
"What we have here, in fact, is remarkably like a highly dramatized version of the Hegalian Unhappy Consciousness, with a few extra refinements: the self's ideal existence is unattainable, and what is actually experienced in self-awareness is failure and finitude finitude itself as a form of humiliation"
p19
(my link added for the Hegalian Unhappy Consciousness, should you be unfamiliar...)
I'll come back later and add some more as there are other things to do - and this snippet is, in context (rather unfair just to lift it like this) insightful. I think. I do need to think, and the challenge of having to do that will keep me going.
Friday, 5 April 2013
Dirty Havana Trilogy - Book 2
This collage of the stink and press of poverty with the slightly less confident celebration of sex and rum continues. At the moment he is trying to sell a bucket to make 20 pesos, he's starving, his partner of the moment is spending a week with a rich Spanish tourist, so there will be no money or food until she gets back. I'm wondering where it's all going, but that's just the thing, at this level of poverty there is nothing but the next meal, the next sleep, the next day, the next fuck if you're lucky.
Thursday, 4 April 2013
Asimov's , The Skiff
Primarily this is a blog about reading but occasionally other subjects creep in - like I'm writing this in the Skiff having signed up for a day a week. Plus I went to meet a business partner re setting up a website and training business, so am now all geared up to learn WordPress, maybe even make a business of it. t
Aimov's is still good hard sci-fi, with enough interest as well as innnovation to make most of the stories intensely readable. The Fantasy & Science Fiction story that I was reading though turned out to be a bit of damp squib - full of quasi (or real, maybe not quasi) Quaker stuff that I thought was all very worthy, but not interesting to read, and a kind of nothingy ending. There was this simulacrum of a steampunk kind, that may or may not have had a soul imprisoned in it, and that's just as bad as slavery isn't it. Yes. End of story.
I've started to write a bit here as well, but the laptop I am using is uncomfortable, hot (literally), and I haven't brought a keyboard with me, so my typing is full of typos. But I think I might be able to write here. The Ivan and Alenoushka story is taking some different directions - and I'm appreciating just how much sheer plod it's going to take to make it into the novel I want it to be. I'm torn between inventing some action now, or choosing another perspective. I think the story needs a little bit more suspense in it. What I am trying to get , to practice, is when to introduce the more savage action, that moves the story up a step, rather than the slow psychological approach of, say, a Richard Ford novel ( if he wrote sci-fi that is). It is quite good writing here, though, I'm in this little self-contained bubble surrounded by people.
Aimov's is still good hard sci-fi, with enough interest as well as innnovation to make most of the stories intensely readable. The Fantasy & Science Fiction story that I was reading though turned out to be a bit of damp squib - full of quasi (or real, maybe not quasi) Quaker stuff that I thought was all very worthy, but not interesting to read, and a kind of nothingy ending. There was this simulacrum of a steampunk kind, that may or may not have had a soul imprisoned in it, and that's just as bad as slavery isn't it. Yes. End of story.
I've started to write a bit here as well, but the laptop I am using is uncomfortable, hot (literally), and I haven't brought a keyboard with me, so my typing is full of typos. But I think I might be able to write here. The Ivan and Alenoushka story is taking some different directions - and I'm appreciating just how much sheer plod it's going to take to make it into the novel I want it to be. I'm torn between inventing some action now, or choosing another perspective. I think the story needs a little bit more suspense in it. What I am trying to get , to practice, is when to introduce the more savage action, that moves the story up a step, rather than the slow psychological approach of, say, a Richard Ford novel ( if he wrote sci-fi that is). It is quite good writing here, though, I'm in this little self-contained bubble surrounded by people.
Wednesday, 3 April 2013
Iain Banks
Desperately sad news, delivered with his typical black humour and optimism: http://www.littlebrown.co.uk/a-personal-statment-iain-banks.page
The only writer who has ever created a decent utopia, in the Culture novels - or at least one I would like to live in. I simply don't know what to say - he says he probably won't last the year, so the last book will be The Quarry. The best science fiction writer I have read.
The only writer who has ever created a decent utopia, in the Culture novels - or at least one I would like to live in. I simply don't know what to say - he says he probably won't last the year, so the last book will be The Quarry. The best science fiction writer I have read.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)